In a season where citizens and leaders alike call for abrogating the civil rights of people who are “not like us,” it may be worthwhile to see the words of another era when violence was encouraged oh-so-casually by public spokesmen, not in response to any particular crime or outrage but merely because the intended victims were representatives of a despised people.
.

Wyandotte Gazette (Kansas City, Kansas)
16 June 1882
.
.

The Inter Ocean (Chicago, Illinois)
7 September 1882
.
.

The Watchman and Southron (Sumter, South Carolina)
14 August 1883
.
.

Atlanta Constitution (Atlanta, Georgia)
17 October 1883
.
.

The Bourbon News (Paris, Kentucky)
19 October 1883
.
.

Herald and Tribune (Jonesborough, Tennessee)
1 November 1883
.
.


The Independent Record (Helena, Montana)
27 November 1883
.
.

Stark County Democrat (Canton, Ohio)
26 December 1883
.
.

The Wilmington Morning Star (Wilmington, North Carolina)
24 February 1884
.
.

The Tennessean (Nashville, Tennessee)
4 March 1884
.
.

Leavenworth Times (Leavenworth, Kansas)
24 May 1884
(For the tarring referred to, see: B.H. Roberts in Water Valley, Mississippi, 1884)
.
.

The Truth (Durham, North Carolina)
1 June 1884
.
.

Harrisburg Daily Independent (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania)
12 August 1884
.
.

Richmond Dispatch (Richmond, Virginia)
14 August 1884
.
.

Harrisburg Telegraph (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania)
4 May 1885
.
.

The Manning Times (Manning, South Carolina)
10 March 1886
.
.

Atlanta Constitution (Atlanta, Georgia)
26 May 1886
.
.

Wilkes-Barre Record (Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania)
4 August 1886
.
.

Saint Paul Globe (Saint Paul, Minnesota)
29 August 1886
.
.

Detroit Free Press (Detroit, Michigan)
17 April 1887
.
.

Harrisburg Telegraph (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania)
10 February 1890
.
Wow. You know, you hear about such sentiments, but reading them here in black and white, I’m struck by how emotional my reaction to them is. They all feel so much more personal than I expected. Thanks for sharing, Ardis.
Thanks for that, Gary. One reason I left them as images clipped from the paper rather than transcribing them is that personal, emotional confrontation.
I don’t know how often these encouragements were acted on, but I wonder how much they represent the majority sentiment, or were they just the ruffian fringe (populated as usual by the proprietors of newspapers).
And, as Gary said, they are powerful. Like a punch in the gut.
We acknowledge that certain talk over the pulpit helped to create the atmosphere that made Mountain Meadows possible, by convincing at least some men that this atrocity was what they were expected to do. If we can admit that about our own people, I think it’s reasonable to hold these editors partially responsible for the acts of violence against missionaries that did occur, by helping to normalize what should have been a shocking idea. Part of the shock for me is the very casualness of the editors’ tone — they weren’t at all afraid of any backlash or even social disapproval for having called for violence.
I once lived in Lee Valley. That’s quite a hike for those “perambulating” elders. When I lived there nearly 100 years later, there were three Mormon families; we were still considered unusual. But the people were generally kind and welcoming. I loved living there.
I liked seeing the scanned image instead of your transcription. It really does add more dynamics to the words, like Mark B says, “a punch in the gut.”
This is quite a collection, Ardis.
Some of these threats may have been journalistic blustering, but it should be remembered that into the twentieth century, missionaries were beaten and tarred and feathered and in a couple of cases murdered, or more frequently egged or threatened or run out of town, particularly in the Southern States Mission.
If you don’t mind, here are a couple more notices to add to the collection, but hand lettered rather than under the auspices of the fourth estate: (Runn Morgan Runn) (This is our last warning). There’s a third notice included in the cited source that I didn’t reproduce on blog, due to the graphic nature of the threat, but it is along the lines of some of these newspaper notices.
Those are stunning, Amy T — being addressed to a specific man makes them all the more threatening.